Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/content/33/3118033/html/againstthewall/index.php:8) in /home/content/33/3118033/html/againstthewall/wp-content/plugins/bad-behavior/bad-behavior/screener.inc.php on line 9
DHS : Against The Wall with JJink

Document shows FBI/ICE sets up users with child porn

August 31, 2013 by  
Filed under General News

Author: Alpha Delta

Source: Planet Infowars

Note from the contributor whom syndicated this article to FederalJack: It will be interesting to see what is revealed on this matter. I like to see if this document is really a government document leaked from ICE or the FBI. If this is legit then we shall pursue charges against the FBI for setting up my buddy in the alternative media with child pornography using the eMule virus. If this document is verifiable then it is proof to the entire world that the dirty criminals in the United States of America government has set people up with child porn knowing they are intending to do stuff like this which is criminal. I will not stand around and let my friends in the alternative truth seeking media which used to be the real press in America, be turned into child porn sex offenders. If ICE and the FBI are doing all this then I demand that the corrupt police detectives whom made my friend give a false confession to child porn be overturned and that he get an apology. I demand that he get his hard drives back and all hia lost video interviews he never released on his website. I demand he be given all his vacation photos back as well including videos since they aren’t the planted child pornography. Upon the corrupt police detectives that are minotiring him and read this article, I demand they remove the sh** off his hard drive that they planted or that the virus planted then give him back his d*** hard drives. Sorry for my bleeped out cussing but I have been suspecting the government was behind my friend having child porn charges pending. I kept trying to convince people that it is the truth because it really is but nobody wants to realize the government is setting people up with child porn but rather suspect every suspect of being a child molester. This is disgraceful what they did to Luke Rudkowski and others. This is unforgivable the thuggery pig scum that wear badges and guns!!!!!!

I have a document I wish to share with the American people by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) for the Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Of course this document was classified and still is today and when I had uploaded it on archive.org, they quickly took down the document within less then one hour before Ben Swann could see it when I had sent him an email on the matter but used archive.org for the file storage as email attachments have got everyone paranoid lately with the tormail.org child porn attacks.

Also when I had tried file hosting sites to a certain degree they were also taken down quickly without sending me a email informing me as to why they would take down such an important document. So I have decided to upload only to these two Onion websites and filehostfree.com.

The documents have been uploaded and the links are found here:



If filehostfree mirror is down then I suspect they are using a system similar to Content ID to ID government document uploads then terminate the files on their server in order to prevent disclosure of government documents through public free file hosting services.

Of course what am I trying to reveal here? A guy claiming to be a FBI agent has sent me this document over Torchat but I was able to verify this man to be a real government agent working for the FBI cyber crimes division working in conjunction with ICE.

This is one of the training notice or training document proposals on new methods the government will use to net child porn suspects. It doesn’t include much information so I suspect it is more of a draft document or proposal. It still reveals quite a lot with why people here and there are mysteriously arrested with child porn then quickly convicted then made a sex offender.

Two new methods have been adopted and have been used for a few years. Of course I am also aware of what happened to Andrew Rose in St. Louis Missouri with being accused of child porn when he was a senior in high school. Also I am aware of hundreds to thousands of families with children all accused of child porn and threatened with sex offender charges with almost life-in-prison sentences over the mere claim of downloading and sharing.

These methods are to distribute and download child pornography on eMule, Kad, Bittorrent, and others. The use of a Trojan horse will be to plant onto anybodies computer whom is even remotely suspected of child porn or on a child porn suspect list that they have no evidence on to get enough evidence fabricated to secure a search warrant. This is used in undercover child porn investigations. So they use the trojan to basically share and download child pornography in order to secure a search warrant from the Internet Crimes Against Children task force or Operation Flicker agents with a joint operation between ICE and the FBI.

The 2nd method would be to stuff child pornography onto movies, music, pirated software, and other digital downloads shared on P2P networks but in a sneaky way so that the user doesn’t detect the child porn. The FBI and ICE monitor the stuffed child porn downloads on P2P to get the IP Addresses then secure a search warrant for a digital and physical search and seizure. I am also not aware of whether they target everybody or whether it was just certain political targets or annoyances by their recorded IP Addresses using their Internet Service Providers.

This of course was approved for use by Operation Flicker with assistance from likely corrupt or secretive police detectives working under the ICAC task force in different states.

With searching up the exact terms “child porn” on Google and have it list only results from a week ago, you will find tens to hundreds of recent news stories of people being either convicted, pleaded not guilty, awaiting trial, or remotely accused of child pornography. Also it lists various ages including early 20 year olds and in some cases underage teenagers if the parents had decided to reach out to the media, and the media decides not to censor the story. Of course I am aware of what all Ben Franklin has done on Federaljack and think it is quite interesting what all he was bringing out and that FJ approves of his articles despite the taboo subject many wanna stay away from. But now the taboo nature of this subject doesn’t matter anymore as many innocent people have been convicted and will be convicted as sex offenders under child porn charges including those involved politically not on the lobbyist payroll. So now the truth must come out and no longer shall these crimes be committed by government without the people being informed as to what their government is doing secretly under the brand of protecting the children or national security.

So right now I suspect the FBI and ICE of setting up people like Luke Rudkowski, Stewart Rhodes, Dan Johnson, Madison Ruppert, and any other individuals in the liberty/truth movement. I also suspect a portion of all child porn raids and busts have been fabricated or have been somewhat of a set up or entrapment. We need a congressional investigation overview into Operation Flicker and the Internet Crimes Against Children task force including the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC) to find out what is really going on here. We need to find out their methods, techniques, and whether they are really just targeting people they have reasonable suspicion(for investigation) and probable cause(for search warrants) to suspect they are pedophiles. Operation Flicker is too much in the dark and too many people have been targeted under this secretive program. I also tried looking for it on Wikipedia and I cannot find a Wikipedia article searching up “Operation Flicker” on Google.

This madness of people being set up and their life ruined with child porn charges must stop. We must go after the real pedophiles instead of the innocence. That is why I am posting this article hoping the truth will get out.

DHS insider: It’s about to get very ugly

June 22, 2013 by  
Filed under General News

Washington, D.C.—Something quite unexpected happened just hours ago, in the dark of night, during a two-day layover in Washington, DC. My son and I are scheduled to take part in a seminar outside of Raleigh, North Carolina this weekend, so we combined our travels to include a side-trip to DC for a business meeting we had previously arranged. It was during this layover that something seemingly ripped from the pages of a spy novel took place.

While I was in the middle of a perfectly good and well needed sleep in the very early hours of this morning, I received a message. I cannot disclose how I received this message, at least not now. The discerning reader will understand why, which, by the way, would make a very interesting story alone. The message was extremely clear and precise. I was to meet my high level DHS insider at a very specific location in Washington, DC, at a time when most ‘normal’ people, except third-shift workers are still asleep. And, I was to come alone and make certain that I was not being followed, and I was to leave any cell phone or electronic device behind.

Seriously? I thought, as I was still trying to make sense of it all. Is all this really necessary? Is this really happening? I considered waking my son to accompany me, but opted to follow the instructions to the letter. Besides, I thought, he’s not the most affable middle-of-the-night person. I left a hastily written but detailed note in my hotel room before my departure in the event something happened. I looked at the digital clock on my rental car (my personal car would never survive our long distance trip). It was 3:20 a.m.

The meeting

I felt like I was part of a spy movie set in our nation’s capital. A chill rose up my spine as I waited in the dark of a chilly, misty and foggy pre-dawn morning. I was to meet with my DHS insider source at a time when most of the nation is asleep, at a place I could swear was featured in the movie All the President’s Men. No one and I mean no one knows I’m here, I thought, as I could see one of the most recognizable national landmarks in the distance.

My source appeared out of nowhere, or so it seemed, and handed me a cup of coffee with the astute observation that I looked like I needed it. So tell me, I asked impatiently, why do we have to meet at this time, at this location, and under such specific circumstances? ‘Because this might be our last meeting,’ he stated.

Maybe it was the lack of sleep, the time, the place, or the chill of the misty rain that caused my sense of foreboding. “Explain,” I asked in an almost demanding tone. So he did, without mincing words.

The details

“If anyone thinks that what’s going on right now with all of this surveillance of American citizens is to fight some sort of foreign enemy, they’re delusional. If people think that this ‘scandal’ can’t get any worse, it will, hour by hour, day by day. This has the ability to bring down our national leadership, the administration and other senior elected officials working in collusion with this administration, both Republican and Democrats. People within the NSA, the Department of Justice, and others, they know who they are, need to come forth with the documentation of ‘policy and practice’ in their possession, disclose what they know, fight what’s going on, and just do their job. I have never seen anything like this, ever. The present administration is going after leakers, media sources, anyone and everyone who is even suspected of ‘betrayal.’ That’s what they call it, ‘betrayal.’ Can you believe the size of their cahones? This administration considers anyone telling the truth about Benghazi, the IRS, hell, you name the issue, ‘betrayal,’” he said.

“We know all this already,” I stated. He looked at me, giving me a look like I’ve never seen, and actually pushed his finger into my chest. “You don’t know jack,” he said, “this is bigger than you can imagine, bigger than anyone can imagine. This administration is collecting names of sources, whistle blowers and their families, names of media sources and everybody they talk to and have talked to, and they already have a huge list. If you’re not working for MSNBC or CNN, you’re probably on that list. If you are a website owner with a brisk readership and a conservative bent, you’re on that list. It’s a political dissident list, not an enemy threat list,” he stated.

“What’s that exactly mean, being on that list, that is,” I asked, trying to make sense of it all.

“It means that there will be censorship under the color of authority of anyone in the U.S. who is attempting to expose what’s going on in our name. It’s about controlling any damning information from reaching epidemic proportions. It’s damage control to the extreme. It’s about the upcoming censorship of the internet in the name of national security. The plans are already in place. These latest reports about ‘spying eyes’ have turned this administration and others connected to it into something very, very dangerous. They feel cornered and threatened, and I’m hearing about some plans they have to shut down the flow of information that is implicating them of wrongdoing. Time is short,” he stated.

“How are they going to do this? How is it even possible” I asked.

“First, they intend to use the Justice Department to silence journalists like in the Rosen case, but they won’t stop there. They will use a host of national security policies, laws, letters, whatever to take out the bigger threats,” he stated.

Next, they will use some sort of excuse, an external threat, and I believe it will be a combination of the economic collapse and a Mid-East war that will begin in Syria to throttle the information that is accessible on the Internet. And you know what? People will believe it!”

Based on what I’ve seen, most of which I should not have seen, the DHS is co-ordinating efforts with other federal agencies to begin to threaten American citizens with incarceration for non-compliance. You know the old talk of color coded lists? Well, this is what they will be using. People exposing the truth about Benghazi, killing the U.S. Dollar, even those questioning Obama?s legal status and eligibility to be President are the current targets. And they’ve had five long years to get to this point. The ugly truth is that these policies and practices did not start under Obama, but long before. This is about the killing of our Constitutional Republic. The murder of our country and the stripping of our rights. While many have been preoccupied with one issue, few have seen the bigger issue. This is the ‘end game,’ for all the marbles,” he stated.

More to come

“Please,” pleaded my source, “get this information out while you can. Tell people what I’m saying, that we don’t have much time, that after the latest exposure of spying, Obama, Jarrett, Axelrod, and others, including members of Congress, have put their plans into high gear. This is about the Marxist takeover of America. This is about our country being able to survive another July 4th holiday. This is about a world war about to break out that will kill millions of people, all because of the agenda of this administration.”

“They are very dangerous and will do anything and everything to stop the onslaught of negative information that’s being reported by the main stream media. But only about one quarter of the real information is being reported. The other three quarters will be the game changer. But first, tell people what I’ve said. Let them know that more will follow but get this information out right now while the internet is still relatively free. Do it today.”

My source provided additional information, but I am abiding by his wish to get this much out. I am writing now to let people know that we are in for seriously dangerous times ahead. Deadly times. War, and censorship under the color of authority and under the pretext of of national security. It’s about to get a lot uglier. Stay tuned.


Copyright © Douglas J. Hagmann and Canada Free Press

Douglas J. Hagmann and his son, Joe Hagmann host The Hagmann & Hagmann Report, a live Internet radio program broadcast each weeknight from 8:00-10:00 p.m. ET.

Douglas Hagmann, founder & director  of the Northeast Intelligence Network, and a multi-state licensed private investigative agency. Doug began using his investigative skills and training to fight terrorism and increase public awareness through his website.

Doug can be reached at: director@homelandsecurityus.com


DHS and FBI Release Statement After Boston Bombings That Photography Can Lead to Terrorism

April 27, 2013 by  
Filed under General News

source:Carlos Miller

On the same day that federal investigators pleaded with the public for photos and videos that would help them identify the Boston Marathon bombers, the Department of Homeland Security and the FBI released a memo stating the “discreet use of cameras or video recorders” could be interpreted as a sign that a terrorist act is being planned.

However, the Joint Intelligence Bulletin released April 16, one day after the attacks, failed to list any specific examples that this was the case, even though it listed several examples of previous planned terrorist attacks that were thwarted.

The truth is, the memo is simply rehashing the same information the feds have been stating for years, which is one reason why so many police officers and security guards tend to treat citizens with cameras as suspected terrorists.

But considering that the Boston Marathon bombings have already launched a new initiative to increase government surveillance on the citizens – including a despicable statement from New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg that the Constitution needs to be altered – it is crucial that we refuse to cooperate with any criminal investigation if all we are doing is taking pictures or shooting video in public, which numerous court cases have determined is protected by the First Amendment

EXCLUSIVE: DHS Small Drone Test Plan Calls for Evaluating Sensors for ‘First Responder, HS Operational Communities’

April 10, 2013 by  
Filed under General News


The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is testing a wide variety of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (SUAS) sensor platforms, including one that can determine whether individuals are armed or unarmed, for use by first responders and frontline homeland security professionals.


The testing is taking place at the Oklahoma Training Center for Unmanned Systems (OTC-UC), a unit of University Multispectral Laboratories (UML), a not-for-profit scientific institution operated for Oklahoma State University (OSU) by Anchor Dynamics, Inc. UML is a “Trusted Agent” for the federal government, technology developers and operators.



DHS’s Science and Technology Directorate’s (S&T) Borders and Maritime Security Division’s Robotic Aircraft for Public Safety (RAPS) testing program is evaluating numerous SUA and sensor systems to identify possible applications for first responders, including search-and-rescue scenarios, response to radiological and chemical incidents and fire response and mapping. In addition, the testing will help to determine whether SUAs are suitable for use by Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and US Coast Guard to provide lower altitude, quick response situational awareness in tactical situations.


SUAS sensor platforms are being tested for use by “first responder and homeland security operational communities” that “can distinguish between unarmed and armed (exposed) personnel,” as well as conducting detection, surveillance, tracking and laser designation of targets of interest at stand-off ranges, according to the RAPS Test Plan obtained by Homeland Security Today.


There’s also a requirement to test SUAS sensors for how well they can capture crime and accident “scene data with still-frame, high definition photos.”


But there’s nothing nefarious about having these sensor capabilities on SUAs for the needs of law enforcement and other first responders, said a RAPS program official, who requested anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the program publicly. DHS’s chief privacy official concluded that the testing program posed no privacy issues in the Nov. 16 Privacy Impact Assessment for the RAPS Project.


The RAPS Test Plan also involves testing sensor suites to “enhance the search and rescue capabilities of first responders by increasing [their] situational awareness.” And to that end, SUA sensors are being tested for their ability to “locate and provide the position of targets of interest satisfactorily for search and rescue personnel in a variety of terrain and day conditions.”


To enhance fire and disaster response capabilities of first responders by increasing their situational awareness, SUA sensors are being tested for their ability to locate and provide the position of fire or hot spots despite the presence of objects that obscure their line-of-site; locate and provide the position and concentration of chemical agents; and locate and provide the position and concentration of radiological agents.


The RAPS Test Plan explained that “Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems may soon become valuable tools for first and emergency responders and for those responsible for US border security.” It emphasized that “SUAS can provide tactical, rapid-response capabilities and much better situational awareness before field officers and agents respond to and engage in potentially dangerous operations.”


The test plan explained that “Within the United States, almost 50,000 police and fire departments exist but only about 300 (less than 1 percent) have aviation departments, owing primarily to the significant cost of acquiring, operating and maintaining manned fixed-wing and rotary-wing platforms. The estimated cost per flight hour for these assets is 300 times more expensive than commercially available SUAS which can be operated at costs lower than those of a typical police cruiser. But for state, county or city entities to become potential users of SUAS, their adoption must be justifiable and affordable. Improved sensor and platform capabilities, and economies of scale, now bring SUAS within reach of the budgets of many small first responder organizations.”


“Considering the size and diversity of the user communities targeted by this program,” the RAPS Test Plan said, “our approach concerning SUAS requirements is to focus primarily on advancing the near-term transition of good, affordable SUAS capabilities using relatively mature solutions. Working closely with senior law enforcement and fire operators in the field, we derived high-level SUAS needs tied to notional, top-priority scenarios for SUAS that, if realized, may or would provide good value to users — depending partly on the results of testing as envisioned” in the RAPS testing plan.


Consequently, the test plan explained that “The purpose of [the RAPS] project is to assess the extent to which SUAS can enhance situational awareness in support of first responder and border security events,” the test plan says, noting that “such events include, but are not limited to, law enforcement response, fire response, search and rescue, response to hazardous material (HAZMAT) spills or incidents and response to intrusions at US international borders.” In addition, “Where feasible and applicable, our testing will verify SUAS performance characteristics that may impact their eventual integration into the National Air Space System.”


“As one of many first responder support initiatives within DHS S&T, the primary outcome of RAPS will be a knowledge and database resource consisting of test reports, user testimonials and guidelines for adoption by the operational community,” the RAPS Test Plan pointed out. “The RAPS team will study fixed- and rotary-wing aircraft having gross takeoff weights of 25 lbs. or less, typically, using key performance measures in a variety of simulated but realistic, real-world operational scenarios that focus on the use of SUAS technology in response to situations where human lives are in imminent danger.”


The RAPS testing is being carried out at the Ft. Sill Army Post near Lawton, Okla. because DHS found the Army base “to be the optimal site to conduct RAPS test operations,” the test plan said. “The ready availability of restricted airspace at Ft. Sill and its central location within the continental US make it logistically accessible and convenient to participating vendors.” In addition, the test plan said “the Ft. Sill test sites offer good flying conditions year-round and provide a variety of terrain features needed for conducting search-and-rescue and other test scenarios.”


Oklahoma has emerged as a leader in Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS). DHS is working closely with the state on the RAPS program through Gov. Mary Fallin’s Unmanned Aerial Systems Council, as the federal initiative is being conducted through OSU’s University Multispectral Laboratories’ advanced testing facility that’s uniquely positioned within Ft. Sill’s 200 square miles of restricted airspace.


“The strong support of the State of Oklahoma first responder community underscored the benefits of the Ft. Sill test site,” DHS said.


“Aerospace represents a significant portion of our state economy and UAS is expected to be the most dynamic growth sector within the aerospace industry in the next decade,” said Unmanned Systems Alliance of Oklahoma (USA-OK) President, James L. Grimsley. “This is an important time for the unmanned aerial systems industry and for Oklahoma.”


“Successful SUAS test operations at Ft. Sill may lead, later, to more complex SUAS operational testing at two other Oklahoma sites,” the RAPS Test Plan said. These sites are the Oklahoma National Guard’s Camp Gruber and the University Multispectral Laboratory’s test site at Chilocco, Okla., “both of which have varied and realistic urban complex facilities.”


The RAPS program began with DHS’s Request for Information (RFI) issued on Sept. 24, 2012 seeking white papers from SUAS vendors interested in participating in the testing project. The deadline for the papers was Oct. 31, 2012.


However, the testing program “is not linked to any intended procurement action, nor does it imply intent to initiate such action,” DHS explained.


Public and congressional concerns over the expanding use of UAVs of all kinds by federal, state and local law enforcement were exacerbated recently following a report by CNET.com that DHS has “customized its Predator drones” to be able to “identify civilians carrying guns and tracking their cell phones.”


CNET.com reported that DHS’s “specifications for its drones … ‘shall be capable of identifying a standing human being at night as likely armed or not,’” and that “They also specify ‘signals interception’ technology that can capture communications in the frequency ranges used by mobile phones and ‘direction finding’ technology that can identify the locations of mobile devices or two-way radios.”


The disclosure was based on an apparent “unredacted copy” of the May 26, 2005, CBP Office of Air and Marine (OAM) Performance Specification for the DHS/Customs and Border Protection Unmanned Aerial Vehicle System document that DHS released in redacted form to the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) pursuant to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request.


An updated March 10, 2010 CBP OAM performance specifications document for CBP’s Predator B UAV also was obtained by EPIC under the FOIA, and portions of it also were redacted.


Most of the redactions, though, were made pursuant to legitimate FOIA exemptions authorizing the withholding of records compiled for law enforcement purposes or that would disclose techniques and procedures for law enforcement investigations.


Much of the redacted information deals with sensitive operational and performance capabilities of CBP’s fleet of Predators, as well sensitive technical data on the UAVs’ sensor packages and specifications.


A CBP spokesman told CNET.com the agency “is not deploying signals interception capabilities on its UAS fleet. Any potential deployment of such technology in the future would be implemented in full consideration of civil rights, civil liberties and privacy interests and in a manner consistent with the law and long-standing law enforcement practices.”


DHS’s RAPS Program Manager, Dr. John Appleby, told Homeland Security Today the department “is very sensitive to the privacy and civil rights issues that are involved with our [UAV] systems and testing.”


But privacy rights advocates don’t see it that way. EPIC’s Ginger McCall, director of the group’s Open Government Project, has said CBP’s UAS requirements documents “clearly evidence that the Department of Homeland Security is developing drones with signals interception technology and the capability to identify people on the ground,” and that “This allows for invasive surveillance, including potential communications surveillance, that could run afoul of federal privacy laws.”


A DHS official who spoke to Homeland Security Today on background about the issue explained that CBP needed to have “a whole host of requirements for its [Predators] for all possible needs to support border security operations, but that doesn’t mean they’re all being used … people jump to all sorts of conclusions based on what they think they know or understand.”


The official said the Predators are capable of distinguishing whether objects detected on the ground are people, animals, vehicles or something else, and emphasized that this capability is needed when, for example, the UAVs are being used to support Border Patrol agents on the ground who are trying to apprehend human- or narco-traffickers in difficult terrain or circumstances, or when conducting border surveillance missions for potential illegal cross-border activity.


But this capability isn’t any different from ground-based radar that can distinguish between a human and a truck CBP has tested that may be incorporated into its Integrated Fixed Tower program Homeland Security Today examined in detail last Oct.


As for the deployment of communications interception technology on CBP’s Predators, officials adamantly said there are numerous legal issues involved “that would have to be worked out” before this capability can routinely be used.

SPLC Report: Patriots Are Terrorists & Present Real Danger to Government

March 9, 2013 by  
Filed under General News

source:Susanne Posel Occupy Corporatism

The propaganda document entitled, “The Year in Hate and Extremism” was recently published by the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC). This report criticizes Patriots are a viable threat to the US government and places them in the same category as other right-wing extremists.

According to the SPLC, constitutionalists, racists and terrorists are organizing in the US at record levels which places the current President in danger because he is half black.

The report reads: “Capping four years of explosive growth sparked by the election of America’s first black president and anger over the economy, the number of conspiracy-minded antigovernment “Patriot” groups reached an all-time high of 1,360 in 2012, while the number of hard-core hate groups remained above 1,000. As President Obama enters his second term with an agenda of gun control and immigration reform, the rage on the right is likely to intensify.”

SPLC states that Patriots are convinced of a movement toward One World Government which causes them to act out in an extreme manner, organize against the current administration and recruit more citizens at an all-time high.

Citing Senator Rand Paul’s comment that Obama has a “king complex” and House Representative Trey Radel’s statement about impeaching Obama, the SPLC claims that organizations such as the Tea Party, and constitutional sheriffs such as Richard Mack are inciting a second civil war with talk of gun grabs by the federal government.

Back in 2011, Vice President Joe Biden accused the Tea Party of having “acted like terrorists” asserting that “we have negotiated with terrorists. This small group of terrorists have made it impossible to spend any money.” This comment came on the heels of assertions that talking to representatives affiliated with the Tea Party are liken to discussing buracracy with Republicans with “guns to their heads” referencing that the Tea Party wielded violent authority of the political party.

SPLC has redefined extremism to include the Patriot Movement as groups of Americans that believe conspiratorially that the US government will confiscate the guns, redact their 2nd Amendment rights and impose tyrannical regime controls.

Bill Hahn, spokesman for the John Birch Society explains that his organization is does not condone or promote violence, yet urges Americans to preserve their Constitutional rights. Everett Wilkinson, member of the National Liberty Federation (NLF) asserts that Patriot groups promote peaceful resolution and that the SPLC “is a liberal organization that likes to spread propaganda about right-wing and conservative groups.”

Wilkinson goes on to say that the NLF has put out a call for land “to hold training sessions for prepping, Constitution classes, militia training, medical, alternative communications, etc. We do respect people’s right to defend themselves, but we are not a military-type organization or anything like that. We’re a grassroots activist organization focused on legislative issues and changing what’s happening in government. We’ve had thousands of rallies since 2009 and we’ve yet to have a violent incident.”

Earlier this year, a paper entitled “Challengers from the Sidelines: Understanding America’s Violent Far-Right” published by Combating Terrorism Center, a think-tank at the West Point US Military Academy that the “far-right”, “anti-federalist” and groups that support “civil activism, individual freedoms and self-government” are dangerous as “racist/white supremacy movement, an anti-federalist movement and a fundamentalist movement.”

The paper asserts that Islamic extremists are coercing populations in the Middle East, Africa and Asia to assist them in gaining power with the purpose of over-throwing the US government and its allies.

The document states that these “espouse strong convictions regarding the federal government, believing it to be corrupt and tyrannical, with a natural tendency to intrude on individuals’ civil and constitutional rights. Finally, they support civil activism, individual freedoms, and self-government. Extremists in the anti-federalist movement direct mObama Protestost their violence against the federal government and its proxies in law enforcement.”

It goes on to correlate modern movements supporting a return to a Constitutional Republic as being violent conservatives living in the past. The report reads: “While liberal worldviews are future- or progressive -oriented, conservative perspectives are more past-oriented, and in general, are interested in preserving the status quo.” the report says. “The far right represents a more extreme version of conservatism, as its political vision is usually justified by the aspiration to restore or preserve values and practices that are part of the idealized historical heritage of the nation or ethnic community.”

The report claims “while far-right groups’ ideology is designed to exclude minorities and foreigners, the liberal-democratic system is designed to emphasize civil rights, minority rights and the balance of power.”

According to Doug Haggman’s DHS informant the plan concerning a false flag attack will coincide with a staged assignation attempt on Obama that will be linked to a white supremacist group that will be used to incite black and Hispanic Americans into starting riots all across the nation.

In this scenario a race war will be the situation needed to implement martial law effectively locking down the US, US Army control of the urban cities, erecting DHS checkpoints on all major points of travel, severe restrictions on travel for all citizens and the suspension of elections to ensure that Obama remain seated as the President of the US.

The DHS informant stated: “The DHS is actively preparing for massive social unrest inside the United States. He then corrected himself, stating that ‘a civil war’ is the more appropriate term. Certain elements of the government are not only expecting and preparing for it, they are actually facilitating it.”

Daryl Johnson, former terror analyst for DHS claims that there has been an insurgence of domestic terrorists as evidenced by the prepper communities and conservative groups who “stockpile weapons” and “infect” the minds of the masses with talk of mass violence.

The Joint Threat Assessment memo entitled the “2010 State of the Union Address: Joint Threat Assessment”, which propagandized terrorism against Obama claimed that Obama would be attacked by a “lone offender” who would be a member of the US military.

Last year, John Whitehead, constitutional attorney for former US Marine Brandon Raub, said that veterans all over the country have been disappearing.

Whitehead says that he is receiving correspondence from people across America that report that US veterans are being detained in psychiatric hospitals for speaking out against the US government. Back in January of this year, Whitehead pointed out that the US government, under directives of Obama, has labeled constitutionalists as terrorists with the signing of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) that “would allow the military to show up at your door if you’re a ‘potential terrorist,’ and “put you in military detention where seeing a lawyer is difficult.”


Sen Paul Distracts Public While House Approves $1 Trillion Budget Increase

March 9, 2013 by  
Filed under General News

source:Susanne Posel Occupy Corporatism

After the filibuster spectacle on Capitol Hill by Senator Rand Paul, Attorney General Eric Holder wrote another letter wherein he retracted his original statement concerning Obama’s legality to use drones in targeted assassination of American citizens on US soil. Holder said: “It has come to my attention that you have now asked an additional question, ‘Does the President have the authority to use a weaponized drone to kill an American not engaged in combat on American soil?’ The answer to that question is no.”

Senator Rand Paul Second Letter by

After receiving this letter, Paul agreed to support Brennan’s nomination for director of the CIA.

On a broadcast on FoxNews, Paul said that Holder explained that the President does not have the right to kill unarmed and non-combative Americans on American soil.

Paul claimed a victory with this “answer”; however it is glossed over in the mainstream media that the response from Holder did not clarify who is a combatant.

Based on the National Defense Authorization Act, anyone can be suspected of being a combatant by having alleged ties to a terrorist group.

Just recently, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) have said that constitutionalists and anti-government groups are extremists and liken to being terrorist organizations.

While both the mainstream and alternative media were focused on the dog-and-pony show conducted by Paul and Holder regarding drones, the House of Representatives approved a bill that would grant funding to the federal government through September of 2013 while a supposed major budget cut is running rampant, stifling the economic stance of the US government.

House Representative Harold Rogers, head of the Appropriations Committee introduced this resolution to the tune of $982 billion (just shy of 1 trillion dollars) to avoid a near complete governmental shutdown at the end of this month.The very same day of Paul’s 13 hour filibuster, the House secured funding for the federal government at the expense of taxpayer and under cover of a 13 hour distraction.

While the rest of the country faces sequestering measures, the US Military Industrial Complex will be well funded to conduct their business.

The Department of Defense (DoD), the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and Planned Parenthood would continue to remain funded with that nearly $1 trillion appropriated by the House resolution.

Tamara Keith of NPR explains: “Democrats and the White House have made it clear they don’t like this bill because it locks in across-the-board spending cuts and only gives additional budget flexibility to the Defense and Veterans Affairs departments. Senate leaders say they plan to make changes to allow other agencies more flexibility as well. But they aren’t planning to undo the sequester cuts, which means a fight that would threaten a government shutdown is unlikely.”

John Brennan, the Assassination Czar, was sworn in this week as the new director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) by Vice President Joe Biden. The Obama camp made a special note that Brennan took his oath of office over “an original draft of the Constitution that had George Washington’s personal handwriting and annotations on it, dating from 1787.”

The symbolic tone surrounding the document Brennan swore allegiance to was the version of the Constitution prior to the inclusion of the Bill of Rights; “which did not officially go into effect until December 1791 after ratification by states.”original

The statement here is that Brennan swore to uphold the rights of Americans except their freedom of speech, right to bear arms and right to not have to be subjected to unreasonable searches and seizures.

Considering Brennan’s history with drones and their current application by the DHS of drones to be used as surveillance tools on unsuspecting Americans, the ceremony is fitting.

DHS have secured unmanned aerial vehicles that are equipped to conduct surveillance, intercept cellular communications and determine if the human target is armed.

The Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) has obtained performance specification documents through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) that confirm “the Bureau of Customs and Border Protection is operating drones in the United States capable of intercepting electronic communications.”

The documents also confirm that the drones “have the capacity to recognize and identify a person on the ground.” DHS drones were designed to “be capable of identifying a standing human being at night as likely armed or not” and “be capable of marking a target into a retrievable database.”

Alan Gottlieb, founder and vice president of the Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) responded to the DHS drone capabilities: “I am very concerned that this technology will be used against law-abiding American firearms owners. This could violate Fourth Amendment rights as well as Second Amendment rights.”


The California Assembly, specifically members Jeff Gorell and Steven Bradford, have collaborated to restrict the use of drones by the local police and state officials.

Gorell and Bradford have introduced AB 1327 which states emphatically that the law enforcement utilizing drones for surveillance must have obtained a warrant prior to deployment of unmanned aerial vehicles.

The bill states:

(b) A law enforcement agency may use an unmanned aircraft system, or contract for the use of an unmanned aircraft system, if it has a reasonable expectation that the unmanned aircraft system will collect evidence relating to criminal activity and if it has obtained a warrant based on probable cause pursuant to this code. (c) A law enforcement agency, without obtaining a warrant, may use an unmanned aircraft system, or contract for the use of an unmanned aircraft system, in emergency situations, including, but not limited to, fires, hostage crises, and search and rescue operations on land or water.

Should a private person choose to use a drone for surveillance, they will be “subject to Section 14350 or a person or entity under contract to a public agency, for the purpose of that contract, shall not use an unmanned aircraft system, or contract for the use of an unmanned aircraft system, for the purpose of surveillance of another person without that person’s consent.”

While the reality and potential of drones flying in US skies is becoming part of a national debate, the US Air Force have suddenly stopped posting statistics on drone strikes in the Middle East, specifically Afghanistan.

Statistics from last month conveniently went missing when the total analysis was published for the public to see.

Both the Pentagon and Air Force Central Command declined to publically comment on the change. However this change coincided with Paul’s filibuster of Brennan over Holder’s comments that the President could strike American citizens with “lethal force” (using drones) on US soil.

2 out of every 3 Americans lost Fourth Amendment protections to DHS

February 20, 2013 by  
Filed under General News

Two out of every three people reading this could have your electronic devices searched, without there being any reasonable suspicion, because the Department of Homeland Security has decided that such search and seizures do not violate your Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable search and seizure. Border agents don’t need probable cause and they don’t need a stinking warrant since they don’t need to prove any reasonable suspicion first. Nor, sadly, do two out of three people have First Amendment protection; it is as if DHS has voided those Constitutional amendments and protections they provide to nearly 200 million Americans.

United States Constitution Free Zone Map shows 2 out of every 3 Americans lost Fourth Amendment protections to DHS

Those numbers come from the ACLU’s estimates of how many people live within 100 miles of the United States border, since Homeland Security’s Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties (CLCR) concluded that border searches of electronic devices do not violate the Fourth Amendment. Previously, the ACLU called this area the Constitution-Free Zone and provided a map showing how many people within states along the all our borders are affected without constitutional rights. The estimate is that nearly two out of three Americans live in the Constitution-Free Zone.

Full Article

Warning: Shopping Mall Rent-a-Cops are now harassing photographers taking photos of Christmas decorations all over America

December 11, 2012 by  
Filed under General News

Author: Silence DoGood

Source: FederalJack

Only in North Korea can taking photos of Malls, Government buildings, or of anything lead to arrests, harassment by law enforcement or rent-a-cops, and even be told that photography is against policy or against the law when there is no law nor any policy prohibiting photos nor was there any complaints by the property owner. This information has been brought out by a undercover truth movement operative, used to be alternative media founder and reporter until the cops came after him for his website exposing too much so he became a undercover operative for the truth movement, that mainly just wanted to take non political photos of the Christmas decorations at a mall. The information has been confirmed to be valid with not just the source which wishes to remain anonymous, it looks like others are complaining about getting the same treatment just for taking a few amateur photos of Christmas decorations at a mall.

Not only has two malls had creepy Nazi, or even fat weird eye looking officers treating their guests like criminals for simply taking a innocent photograph of Christmas decorations which is free advertisement to the mall and business owners, why wouldn’t they want photos taken of their shops full of Christmas decorations as they don’t have to pay any commission to get more interested customers, but there is also stories posted online by other people experiencing the same dilemma that see no signs or rules saying Photography is not allowed without permission, yet the security guards in many malls now are taking the opportunity to act tough against shoppers and act like it is illegal to take photographs or that it represents a plan to possibly commit an act of terrorism even though photography in a majority of cases has never been used to commit any violent act as all the terrorist would have to do is go to the city hall and request the floor plans and construction records of any particular mall, not take stupid little photographs of Christmas trees.

A blogger also experiencing the new form of tyranny of mall officials now blocking any right of photography and any news reporting except for mainstream corporate photographers and media all thanks to the Department of Homeland Security telling mall owners that photography could be used to plan an attack against any private and governmental infrastructure.

If it was true (according to a security personnel in one of the malls in Mandaluyong City) that the mall has a policy that disallows any mall goer (or any person really) from taking pictures (of any of its properties including the Christmas decoration), then the mall should inform the public. They should put up posters and signs like this one above on the entrances and exits of the mall. They should also put up this sign beside their Christmas Tree. I would certainly follow and respect their policy, and most likely change my mind about the mall… forever!

Even though people will argue private property owners can do whatever they want, this article is exposing that multiple malls all across the country are prohibiting photography when before they never had a problem with it. The fact that every mall has no rule written on signs nor any viewable policy list stating that photography is prohibited means that this is a new tactic by Obama’s secret police to get the public being used to believing that photography is illegal or against the rules whether it be a government property or private property. All of this is being done under the guise of national security.

Photo taking of Christmas decorations has always been an American past time even pay a little money to pose with Santa Claus. I have never heard or seen a time when taking a few photos of Christmas decorations inside big malls can lead to creepy fat or even Nazi look-a-like security guards just show up and tell you that it is there policy to not be allowed to take photos without permission when the rule boards say no such thing or when they just tell you no photo taking is allowed when there is no rules therefore the security guards shouldn’t harass you unless you break one of their rules or even get a complain from the mall property owner which is rarely the case or if it is ever even the case as they are too busy to be coming after hobby photographers.

This photo is now a supposed criminal act in Oak Hollow Mall in North Carolina:

All it took was a few photos and less then five minutes for security guards to start harassing the family interested in taking hobby photos of the Christmas decorations for the family photo album, nothing to plot terror, nothing perverted, nothing to encourage illegal activity, just taking a photo of Christmas decorations at a mall which never made any big deal out of it ever before until after 9/11 and Homeland Security.

This is the story of what happened from that person while it is still fresh in that persons mind to get on public record.

He walked in the Oak Hollow NC mall with three others, a veteran grandfather wearing a veteran cap, a grandmother wanting to see the Christmas decorations and take photos of it not to mention explore the mall and maybe buy something which gives the mall more business, a guy that looks young but is in his 20’s, and his mother that also wanted to see the beautiful Christmas lights.

After he had taken around 3-4 est. amount of photos of the Santa fortress as you see in the photo above, he walked to the back as his family was going to use the restroom then the 20yo was all alone ready to be preyed upon by authorities. He was walking towards the stairs right next to the elevator to get a photo of the fortress from a different angle and that was when a Mall Security cop just showed up out of the blue walking to the left of him. Then he just minded his own business and just walked forward and not giving any attention to the officer, then as he gets close to the stairs the officer says hello while he stairs at him looking for anything he may have of interest (What was he a shoplifter?? NO!!! He only been in the store for less then 5 minutes so that can’t be it) then started coming back at him and started asking in a weird kind of way “What are you doing?” and stared at his camera, He been spotted!!!!!! AHHHHAHHAHHHH! With his digital camera!!!!! then he explained that he had only taken photos of the Christmas decorations and that was when things started getting ugly. That’s when the officer started saying he was not permitted to do that, even though there was no sign and no official policies prohibiting photography within the mall property(even their own website has no rules against photography.) He asked if he can only get photos of the Christmas decorations and no stores therefore proves the person wasn’t planning anything malicious, then the officer replied with the fact that he would have to drive over 2 hours all the way back to the mall in the daytime and have to ask the mall manager permission just to take a photo of a Christmas fortress or castle decoration. That’s when he knew he couldn’t argue with the officer knowing very well the cops can be called on him for causing trouble so he opened up his camera bag and dropped his camera in there and said to the officer “Okay! I put up my camera! alright!!!” then asked him if he had read the Homeland Security manual where it claims that photography is terrorism and he refused to answer at all even though he wasn’t being recorded by a camcorder or even a tape recorder which the guy could have done if he wanted to since North Carolina wiretap law allows a private conversation to be recorded as long as at least one party consents not to mention the mall has security cameras so recording is already permitted by mall security. Then the officer leaves and he complains to his grandfather that just went outside the restroom to sit on a bench. e told him what the security officer did and said “This is ridiculous!” and “What has happened to mall security these days! They are getting worse these days!” and apparently they overheard him so they started ganging up as two now and stood on the second story of the mall watching him and his grandfather. Then as his mother and grandmother walked out of the restroom he told them what the security guard did to him as well as complain about what happened and as they were doing that security guards were monitoring him as if he may cause trouble so they all decided to leave and felt a funny feeling that usually comes when somebodies life and safety is in danger. So the whole family decided to leave and he decided to yell before being out the door successfully “I AM GETTING OUT OF THE MALL!,” “I DON’T FEEL WELCOME HERE!,” and that “I’LL NEVER COME TO YOUR MALL AGAIN.” then as he walked out to the parking lot he yelled in a very loud voice “PHOTOGRAPHY IS NOW A CRIME IN AMERICA!” while few people were out then as his family then was out the front doors, the security guard was following them as they walked out and quickly got back to the car then the security guard started walking back and fourth watching them as if he was trying to get their license plate number to call the police and possibly used that to raid their house then the family left. As the security guard was trying to get the license plate number, when no law was broken at all they can kick them off their property but cannot arrest them for disagreeing with the mall security officers own decree that photography is illegal when the mall has no rules against it, he started taking his digital camera out and this time to shoot video and the security guard started walking away as trying to not get filmed by the cursive camera but he may have got himself on camera acting like a homeland security type thug. The video may or may not be posted on YouTube but in the event that it does, another FederalJack post will be made with the YouTube embed and link for those to copy and share on social networking websites. Even if it is private property which anybody will argue that they can do what they want, never at any mall has a security guard makes up rules as the mall has no rules against a certain action, also there is no law in that area against photography, no rules against it, yet the officer will claim it is a rule or law when there isn’t. If that had been a police officer that had tried that, somebody could sue the officer for violation of civil liberties but as it was just a mall cop the only thing that family could do was get their story out to FederalJack and the alternative media network. The funny thing was that officer did not act normal but instead gave a weird look in his eyes during the whole incident at the beginning as if the so-called photographer had done something to harm the mall and people or something illegal. He had the look of “Oh Your Suspicious!” or that usual look that crooked cops like to use. That whole satisfied look when dominating somebody and making them feel threatened or scared.

That same family visited another mall that same day to get photos of their Christmas decorations. That one was the four seasons town center mall around Greensboro, NC. So somebody whom only takes interesting photos which is not a suspicious type, starts point a camera at one store’s fluor delay(misspelling) a flower symbol that is used in ancient times, the officer said “No Photography! Of the stores!” then he showed her the lcd display and explained to her that he only took a photo of that flower symbol and nothing else. Then she said he cannot do that and had to put his camera up before the officer would leave him be. He only didn’t get in trouble for the Christmas decorations photo because there weren’t any officers walking around that area by the time he was there with his family taking photos.

So what is the coincidence that two malls and more around the same time around the same year near Christmas, is mall security officers across the country are targeting people over the crime of taking photographs which isn’t a crime but the security guards or rent-a-cops think they are GOD and can bark whatever orders they see fit like your own a military base with classified government secrets.

Why would security guards at malls treat photographers like garbage or like criminals because the FBI earlier this year released their “Communities Against Terrorism” Suspicious Activity Reporting Flyers. The army of propaganda fliers does include shopping malls. Even under the DHS-FBI Suspicious Activity Reporting Bulletin: Photography, it indicates that photography inside of shopping malls are a suspicious activity. It claims that “(U//FOUO) An individual took photos and video in a mall while holding the phone close to his body at waist level. The photographs and video footage included the mall storefronts, upper mall structures, bridges, exit doors, and closed-circuit television cameras.” Even in September 2012, Homeland Security partners with Simon owned shopping malls according to the Examiner.com news site. There is likely hundreds of other examples as to put together a jigsaw puzzle as to why people all over America are getting in trouble for simply taking one or more photos of Christmas decorations and even ancient flower symbols or any other symbols at store signs that triggered interest in the photographer.


DHS Labels Liberty-Lovers as Potential Terrorists

November 25, 2012 by  
Filed under General News



By the Department of Homeland Security’s standards, anyone who just celebrated the Fourth of July can be capable of terrorism. A new study by the DHS states that “those who are reverent of individual liberty” may promote terrorism.

WND.com reports:

The study and related data were recently produced by the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism, or START, at the University of Maryland. START was launched with a $12 million grant from DHS and is recognized by the organization as one of its “Centers for Excellence.” In December, DHS announced it was renewing START’s funding with another $3.6 million.

The study, entitled “Hot Spots of Terrorism and Other Crimes in the United States, 1970-2008,” makes a number of observations, including that one third of all terrorist attacks between 1970 and 2008 took place in five metropolitan counties run by Democrats. The report breaks down the terrorist attacks between the counties, and separates them according to lists based on ideologies, ranging from right-wing and left-wing to religious and single issue.

START defines “left-wing” as anyone who wants “to bring about change through violent revolution rather than through established political process. This category also includes secular left-wing groups that rely heavily on terrorism to overthrow the capitalist system and either establish ‘a dictatorship of the proletariat’ (Maxist-Leninists) or, much more rarely, a decentralized, non-hierarchical political system (anarchists).”

It defines “right-wing” as one who “believes that one’s personal and/or national ‘way of life’ is under attack and is either already lost or that the threat is imminent.” It states that right-wing terrorists include those who revere liberty and are suspicious of a centralized government.

It also defines potential terrorists as those interested in forcing religion into the political sphere and and those opposed to abortion. WND notes, “This is not the first time a government report has listed conservative groups such as evangelical Christians and tea-party members as potential terrorists.”

A 2009 DHS security report issued harsh warnings against unnamed right-wing terrorists, which the DHS defined as those who were opposed to abortion, and were concerned about illegal immigration, an increase in federal power, firearms restrictions, and a loss of American sovereignty.

The report, titled “Right-wing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment,” dated April 7, states that “threats from white supremacist and violent anti-government groups during 2009 have been largely rhetorical and have not indicated plans to carry out violent acts.”

The report from the DHS’s Office of Intelligence and Analysis defines right-wing extremism in the United States as “divided into those groups, movements and adherents that are primarily hate-oriented (based on hatred of particular religious, racial or ethnic groups) and those that are mainly anti-government, rejecting federal authority in favor of state or local authority, or rejecting government authority entirely. It may include groups and individuals that are dedicated to a single issue, such as opposition to abortion or immigration.”

“The consequences of a prolonged economic downturn — including real estate foreclosures, unemployment and an inability to obtain credit — could create a fertile recruiting environment for right-wing extremists and even result in confrontations between such groups and government authorities similar to those in the past,” the 2009 report noted.

It added that “growth in these groups subsided in reaction to increased government scrutiny as a result of the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing and disrupted plots, improvements in the economy and the continued U.S. standing as the pre-eminent world power.”

Similarly, a 2009 report by the Missouri Information Analysis Center labeled those who have bumper stickers for third-party political candidates such as Ron Paul, Bob Barr, and Chuck Baldwin as suspicious individuals. It further warned law enforcement to watch out for individuals with “radical” ideologies based on Christian views, such as opposing illegal immigration, abortion, and federal taxes.

Americans for Legal Immigration stated, “Police were instructed to look for Americans who were concerned about unemployment, taxes, illegal immigration, gangs, border security, abortion, high costs of living, gun restrictions, FEMA, the IRS, The Federal Reserve, and the North American Union/SPP/North American Community. The ‘Missouri Documents’ also said potential domestic terrorists might like gun shows, short wave radios, combat movies, movies with white male heroes, Tom Clancy novels, and Presidential Candidates Ron Paul, Bob Barr, and Chuck Baldwin!”

The FBI’s Communities Against Terrorism program labels those who purchase food in bulk as possible terrorists, as well as those who use cash to purchase items and show interest in using the Internet in public places.

The federal government has been wide-ranging in its use of the “terrorist” label. But START has defended its 2012 report by asserting that unlike previous reports that have labeled members of groups such as the Tea Party as terrorists, its study refers only to those who have actually committed terrorist acts.

But while the report identifies seemingly average Americans as potential terrorists, it completely ignores any references to Islamic terrorism. In fact, its table displaying the “hot spots” for religious terrorism indicates that there was no such terrorism in New York City in the 1990s — totally disregarding the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center in that city.

PJ Media also observes that the report conveniently leaves out the 1994 shooting by admitted anti-Semite Rashid Baz that resulted in the death of 16-year-old Jewish student Ari Halberstam and the attempted murder of dozens more on the Brooklyn Bridge. Baz admitted he shot Halberstam because he was Jewish.

It also ignores the 2002 shooting at the El Al (Israel’s national airline) ticket counter at Los Angeles International Airport by Hesham Mohamed Hadayet, who murdered two and wounded four others. Hadayet was later confirmed by the FBI and DOJ to be an Egyptian terrorist who wanted to be a Muslim martyr.

WND also notes, “By cutting the report off at 2007, it was able to omit events such as the Fort Hood massacre by Maj. Nidal Hasan, who killed 13 people and wounded 29 others, and the Little Rock Army recruiting center, where a Muslim convert shot soldiers in front of a recruiting office.”

Critics note that this new DHS study is yet another example of political correctness run amok, as patriotic Americans are unfairly labeled as terrorist threats even as legitimate threats go unmentioned.


Feds label liberty lovers ‘terrorists’ … again

November 25, 2012 by  
Filed under General News

source :wnd.com

The government is once again promoting the idea of “those who are reverent of individual liberty” being terrorists with a new study funded by the Department of Homeland Security.

The study and related data were recently produced by the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism, or START, at the University of Maryland. START was launched with a $12 million grant from DHS and is recognized by the organization as one of its “Centers for Excellence.” In December, DHS announced it was renewing START’s funding with another $3.6 million.

read more:http://www.wnd.com/2012/07/feds-label-liberty-lovers-terrorists-again/

Next Page »