Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/content/33/3118033/html/againstthewall/index.php:15) in /home/content/33/3118033/html/againstthewall/wp-content/plugins/bad-behavior/bad-behavior/screener.inc.php on line 9
HPV : Against The Wall with JJink

Developer of HPV Vaccines Blasts the Vaccines for Dangers, False Claims

September 1, 2013 by  
Filed under General News

source:natural society

by Elizabeth Renter

The first-hand knowledge of one scientist, responsible for helping to develop  two vaccines for human papillomavirus (HPV), including Gardasil, interestingly  led her to vocally question the vaccines’ safety and effectiveness before  backtracking and denying she ever questioned them. She says that the  vaccines are just as dangerous, if not more so, than the disease they are meant  to prevent, all while thousands of children as young as 9 are being given the  vaccine, sometimes without parental consent.

Dr. Diane Harper was a key developer of the Gardasil HPV vaccine. Beginning  in 2009 she voiced several concerns about the vaccine and its counterpart  Cervarix, saying they caused more  harm than good.

In an article published by CBS News, Dr. Harper says, “The rate of serious  adverse events (from Gardasil) is on par with the death rate of cervical cancer.  Gardasil has been associated with at least as many serious adverse  events as there are deaths from cervical cancer developing each  year.”

She also said the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)  knowingly downplays the dangers of HPV vaccines by  under-reporting adverse events including deaths. She even went so far as to say  the vaccine does nothing, that it doesn’t even reduce the incidence of  cervical cancer.

Read: Deceptive  Gardasil Ad Omits Death Link, Other Facts

Not only did Dr. Harper call into question the effects of Gardasil, but she  questioned the need for it at all, saying at the 4th International  Public Conference on Vaccination in 2009 that the majority of HPV infections  “resolve themselves” in as little as a year, with a very small percentage of  those infected displaying symptoms.

Unfortunately, you won’t hear any more of these soundbites and quotes from  Dr. Harper. Within the last few years, she has said all of them were made up,  that none of the quotes attributed to her were correct. In other words, she  wants us to believe the vaccines are not only safe, but also effective, and that  there must be a mass effort specifically targeting her for misinformation.

What’s been said cannot be unsaid and Dr. Harper’s former opinions were  printed and/or heard in so many venues, it’s laughable to consider them all as  misquotes. One has to wonder what happened to cause Dr. Harper to so suddenly  change her tune.

HPV vaccines are being sold to the American public as a matter of life and  death. They are marketed at parents as a potential lifesaving remedy that must  be administered at a very young age. In some places, like California and  Michigan, children are being given the vaccine without their parents’ knowledge  or consent. These vaccines are far from safe and far from necessary, just ask a  2009 Dr. Harper.

Read more: http://naturalsociety.com/hpv-vaccine-developer-blasts-vaccines-dangers-false-claims/#ixzz2ddW5Oe4H Follow us: @naturalsociety on Twitter | NaturalSociety on Facebook

The Dangers of the HPV vaccines Gardasil & Cervarix (Cervical Cancer vaccination HPV vaccine

August 5, 2012 by  
Filed under General News

I found this video and report at natural news merck and glaxo smith kline are guilty of theft and murder and the FDA and CDC are complicit.I have interviewed doctors and bio engineers, please research befor you just pop a pill or get a shot.They are concerned with money not health.james freeland editor and host of against the wall.


Gardasil and Cervarix, the two vaccines against cervical cancer are heavily promoted through doctors, social media and publicity campaigns and are offered to girls ánd boys ages 9 through 26. The HPV vaccination consists of three shots over 6 months. Millions of girls have already been vaccinated. However, there is no proof that the vaccines actually prevent cervical cancer!

Health authorities claim that cervical cancer is caused by the Human Papilloma Virus but 90% of all HPV infections are self-clearing and do NOT pose a health risk for women with a healthy lifestyle. 90% of all cervical cancer deaths occur in the third world countries due to chronic malnutrition, poor hygiene and lack of Pap tests or Pap smears.

HPV infections are very common. There are more than 100 HPV types, of which around 20 are considered possible high-risk for cervical cancer. Gardasil and Cervarix both claim protection against infection from HPV types 16 and 18, said to be responsible for 70% of cervical cancer cases. Because the vaccines do not prevent infection from other HPV types, women will still need regular Pap tests!

Gardasil and Cervarix provide NO protection for women who are already HPV infected and they increase the risk of developing precancerous lesions by 44.6%!

Gardasil, also known as Gardisil or Silgard, was introduced in 2006 and is produced by Merck. Cervarix was introduced in 2007 and is produced by GlaxoSmithKline.

Both Gardasil and Cervarix contain the adjuvant aluminum, a toxin that can cause serious side effects. Gardasil contains 0.225 mg aluminum hydroxide per injection and Cervarix contains 0.5 mg aluminum hydroxide per injection.

Health authorities claim that Gardasil and Cervarix are ‘safe’ because the number of adverse events reported during clinical trials were the nearly identical to the control group, who was given placebo vaccines. However, the placebo also contained aluminum hydroxide, causing similar number of adverse events! 73.3 percent of the participants who received Gardasil injections during the clinical trials acquired a medical condition…

HPV vaccinations have caused seizures, strokes, paralysis, Guillain-Barré Syndrome, convulsions, fainting, coma, headaches, chronic fatigue, auto-immune diseases, blood clots, muscle weakness, joint pain, arthritis, chest pains, shortness of breath, heart problems, hair loss, weight loss, nausea, vomiting, mood changes, anxiety, insomnia, tremors, itching, rashes, swelling, nerve pain, muscle pain, back pain, swollen lymph nodes, sleep disorders, brain fog, slurred speech, vision and hearing loss, thrombosis, enlarged liver, ruptured ovarian cysts, menstrual pain and cycle changes, enlarged fallopian tubes, ovarian cysts, infertility, spontaneous abortions, stillbirths, birth defects, cervical cancer and over 100 deaths!

“My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge.”
Hosea 4:6 (KJV)

Playlist ‘The Dangers of HPV vaccines’:

More information:

HPV vaccine victims support groups:

Mounting Evidence Shows Many Vaccines are Ineffective and Contribute to Rise of Outbreaks Caused by Mutated Viruses

July 30, 2012 by  
Filed under General News

By Dr. Mercola

In the middle of July, NBC News reported that :

“The U.S. is on course for a record year for  whooping cough, health officials said this week. And while vaccinating kids is  clearly the most important defense, health experts say adults may not realize  they’re supposed to be getting regular shots, too.”

The article goes on to hype what are actually  predictable pertussis (whooping cough) increases and promote the ineffective pertussis  vaccine—basically giving the media their marching orders for this fall’s  propaganda campaign, which centers on blaming  increases in pertussis on parents who file non-medical exemptions for their  kids, which is pure nonsense.

Surprise! Whooping Cough Spreads Mainly through Vaccinated  Populations

In 2010, the largest outbreak of  whooping cough in over 50 years occurred in California. Around that same time,  a scare campaign was launched in the California by Pharma-funded medical trade  associations, state health officials and national media, targeting people  opting out of receiving pertussis vaccine, falsely accusing them of causing the  outbreak.

However, research published in March  of this year paints a very different picture than the one spread by the media .

In fact, the study showed that 81  percent of 2010 California whooping cough cases in people under the age of 18  occurred in those who were fully up to date on the whooping cough vaccine. Eleven  percent had received at least one shot, but not the entire recommended series,  and only eight percent of those stricken  were unvaccinated.

According to the authors :

“This first detailed analysis of a recent  North American pertussis outbreak found widespread disease among fully  vaccinated older children. Starting  approximately three years after prior vaccine dose, attack rates markedly  increased, suggesting inadequate protection or durability from the  acellular vaccine.” [Emphasis  mine]

The pertussis (whooping cough) vaccine is  included as a component in “combination” shots that include tetanus and  diphtheria (DPT, DTaP, Tdap) and may also include polio, hepatitis B, and/or  Haemophilus Influenza B (Hib). CDC data shows  84 percent of children under the age of three have received at least FOUR DTaP  shots—which is the acellular pertussis vaccine that was approved in the United  States in 1996—yet, despite this high vaccination rate, whooping cough still  keeps circulating among both the vaccinated and unvaccinated.

So,  as clearly evidenced in this study, the vaccine likely provides very little, if  any, protection from the disease. In fact, the research suggests those who  are fully vaccinated may in fact be more  likely to get the disease than unvaccinated populations.

Why Do Pertussis Vaccines Fail Despite Claimed Efficacy?

Interestingly in a recent article published in the journal  Pediatrics , author James D. Cherry, MD, reveals that estimates for  pertussis vaccine efficacy have been significantly inflated due to the case  definitions adopted by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 1991, which  required laboratory confirmation and 21 days or more of paroxysmal cough. All less  severe cases were excluded.  He states:

“I was a  member of the WHO committee and disagreed with the primary case definition  because it was clear at that time that this definition would eliminate a  substantial number of cases and therefore inflate reported efficacy values. Nevertheless,  the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research of the Food and Drug Administration  accepted this definition, and package inserts of the US-licensed DTaP vaccines reflect this

….For example, Infanrix… and Daptacel… have stated efficacies  of 84% and 85% respectively. When less severe cough illness is included, however,  the efficacies of these 2 vaccines decrease to 71% and 78% respectively. In  addition, even these latter efficacies are likely inflated owing to  investigator or parental compliance with the study protocol (observer bias).”

Dr. Cherry lists eight potential reasons for why the efficacy of pertussis  vaccines are overestimated:

  1.   Overexpectation of efficacy because of case definition.
  2.     Inflated estimates of efficacy because of observer bias.
  3.     Other Bordetella sp are the cause of similar cough illnesses.
  4.     Lack of initial potency.
  5.     Decay in antibody over time.
  6.     Incomplete antigen package.
  7.     Incorrect balance of antigens in the vaccine.
  8.     Genetic changes in B pertussis

Whooping Cough is Cyclical Disease

B. pertussis whooping cough is a  cyclical disease with natural increases that tend to occur every 4-5 years, no  matter how high the vaccination rate is in a population using DPT/DTaP or Tdap vaccines  on a widespread basis. Whole cell DPT vaccines used in the U.S. from the 1950’s  until the late 1990’s were estimated to be 63 to 94 percent effective and  studies showed that vaccine-acquired immunity fell to about 40 percent after  seven years.

In the study cited above, the researchers noted  the vaccine’s effectiveness was only 41 percent among 2- to 7-year-olds and a  dismal 24 percent among those aged 8-12 .

With this shockingly low rate of  DTaP vaccine effectiveness, the questionable solution public health officials  have come up with is to declare that everybody has to get three primary  shots and three follow-up booster shots in order to get long-lasting  protection —and  that’s provided the vaccine gives you any protection at all!

Why “Cocooning” Vaccines Does Not Work

Additionally, in a futile effort to  address the outbreak, the  American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)   started directing physicians, particularly pediatricians, to offer Tdap  vaccine to parents and close family members of babies under age 2 months, who  are too young to receive a pertussis-containing vaccine themselves. In a recent  study on this topic the researchers concluded:

“… the  parental cocoon program is inefficient and resource intensive for the  prevention of serious outcomes in early infancy.”

Cocooning,”  is a controversial practice and is being promoted by the AAP and government  health officials as a way of protecting babies from whooping cough and other  infectious diseases like influenza by vaccinating their parents and other adult  caregivers. However, there is little evidence to show that this works. In fact,  research from Canada has demonstrated just the opposite. Published last year,  this Canadian study investigated how many parents would need to be vaccinated  in order to prevent infant hospitalizations and deaths from pertussis using the  cocoon strategy ,  and the results were dismal. They found the  number needed to vaccinate (NNV) for parental immunization was at least one  million to prevent ONE infant death; approximately 100,000 for ICU  admission; and >10,000 for hospitalization.

Also Confirmed: U.S.  Varicella Vaccination Program is a Total Flop

In  related vaccine news, a recent review of the US varicella (chickenpox)  vaccination program published in May in the journal Vaccineconcluded the vaccine has:

  • Not  proven to be cost-effective
  • Increased  the incidence of shingles
  • Failed  to provide long-term protection from the disease it targets―chicken pox―and
  • Is  less effective than the natural immunity that existed in the general population  before the vaccine

Here,  vaccine efficacy is again questioned as the efficacy of the varicella vaccine was  found to have declined well below 80 percent by of 2002. The information was  gathered from a review of chicken pox and shingles statistics in the years  since the vaccine was introduced. The researchers point out that although  statistics showed shingles rates increased after the vaccine, “CDC  authorities still claimed” that no increase had occurred.

The  authors also state that the CDC not only ignored the natural boost in immunity  to the community that occurred with wild chickenpox, as opposed to the vaccine,  but also ignored the “rare serious events following varicella  vaccination” as well as the increasing rates of shingles among adults:

“In the  prelicensure era, 95% of adults experienced natural chickenpox (usually as  children)—these cases were usually benign and resulted in long-term immunity. Varicella vaccination is less effective  than the natural immunity that existed in prevaccine communities. Universal  varicella vaccination has not proven to be cost-effective as increased herpes zoster [shingles]  morbidity has disproportionately  offset cost savings associated with reductions in varicella disease. Universal  varicella vaccination has failed to provide long-term protection from VZV  disease.” [Emphasis  mine]

Ridiculous Claims about Herd  Immunity Achieved by HPV Vaccine

According  to a report in the journal Pediatrics ,  which has been praised in major media like Discover Magazine ,  the quadravalent vaccine for HPV, Gardasil, appears to be protecting young  people that haven’t even been vaccinated with it. Not only that, Gardasil has  accomplished this amazing feat in just four years―long before most vaccines  begin to show any sign of what’s known as “herd immunity.”

The  study looked at rates of HPV infection in a small group of teens and young  women at two primary care clinics, and found that infections from the  cancer-causing HPV strain had declined. Apparently, they also observed that  infections in women, who had not been vaccinated, had also declined. The team  concluded the overall decline in both the vaccinated and unvaccinated must have  been due to the vaccine! As per Discover Magazine, if the news pans out to be  true in further research, it will be “pretty exciting.”  Indeed, if this is true it would be an  outright miracle, considering the  fact that this theory is beyond ludicrous.

Consider  that claim in light of these facts:

  • In  the study, 59 percent of participants at two primary care clinics received the  HPV vaccine
  • According  to 2008 survey statistics, an estimated 25 percent of American adolescents 13  to 17 years old had received at least one dose of the HPV vaccine, and a mere  11 percent had received all 3 doses
  • By  2010 the vaccine uptake estimates had nearly doubled, with 48 percent of girls between  the ages of 13 and 17 having received at least one dose of the HPV vaccine

It is  typically taught that the vaccine acquired herd immunity threshold is anywhere  between 80-95 percent of the population, depending on the disease. So, HOW  could the HPV vaccine confer herd immunity when, on a nationwide basis,  less  than half of teens and young women have received the vaccine (and the vast  majority of those have only received one-third of the recommended number of doses)?

Whenever  an outbreak of disease occurs, government health officials are always quick to  point the finger at those who are unvaccinated, stating that it’s because of  them that vaccine induced herd immunity was not achieved, thereby allowing the  disease to flourish (although they rarely if ever offer an explanation for why  so many vaccinated people get sick when they should theoretically be immune).  For most diseases, vaccine-induced herd immunity cannot be achieved unless 80-95  percent of the population is vaccinated against the disease in question. So  truly, for the HPV vaccine to suddenly confer herd immunity at less than 50  percent coverage would be nothing short of a miracle.

This “study”  is nothing but marketing masquerading as science.

Discover  magazine also didn’t mention the fact that at least five individuals on the  seven-member team making these over-the-top claims are paid speakers and  consultants for Merck, or have received research funds from Merck to develop  this vaccine―meaning this wasn’t exactly an independent, outside group with no  conflicting interests in the outcome. Please also note that the president of  the Merck Vaccine Division, Julie Gerberding, is the former head of the CDC.

Discover  also didn’t mention that the rates of the rates of sexual activity—the primary  way HPV is spread—had also declined during the years of the study period, which  could indicate that the reason HPV infection rates went down was not “herd”  immunity acquired from the vaccine, but rather that fewer young people were  having sex.

read more:http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2012/07/30/whooping-cough-vaccine.aspx