DOJ Wants to Arrest You for Terrorism for Not Liking Them Read more at http://thefreethoughtproject.com/u-s-government-cage-liking/#tibKi4ROowxqbJkM.99

October 21, 2015 by  
Filed under General News

source: Larken Rose
Propagandists for the U.S. ruling class—I mean, “spokespersons for the United States government”—usually choose their words carefully, trying to use insinuation to demonize their opponents, euphemisms to deify themselves, and other spin and lies to make freedom sound bad and authoritarian power sound good. But they’re not usually stupid enough to come right out and say, “war is peace; freedom is slavery; ignorance is strength” (see George Orwell’s “1984”). In most cases, to see their true agenda, you need to read between the lines. Sometimes, however, their totalitarian mentality is put on display for all to see.

Consider, for example, this CNN article, talking about how the DOJ wants to shift its focus more to domestic “terror groups.”

Just so we’re clear, I’m a voluntaryist myself, who believes in the non-aggression principle. I abhor actual assault, murder and terrorism (which, as it happens, is committed by agents of “government” far more often than by anyone else). So if someone is actually harming or endangering innocents, I hope someone stops them, using whatever it takes. Whether or not the aggressor, or the protector, wears a badge is totally morally irrelevant. Ain’t I just an extreme, dangerous kook? Anyway, back to the story.

The CNN article starts by quoting “government” officials saying that “domestic terror groups” are a greater threat to America than ISIS or al Qaeda. Well, since those (sometimes fictional) groups are no threat at all to America, that isn’t saying much. Then the article explains how, according to Assistant Attorney General John Carlin, the DOJ has a new plan “that will coordinate the investigation and prosecution of anti-government and hate groups.” That’s already a strange thing to say, since neither being anti-“government” nor hating someone is actually a crime. But wait. It gets worse.

Carlin is then quoted as claiming that “a number of violent attacks or plots against the U.S.” were motivated by “anti-government views, racism, bigotry and anarchy, and other despicable beliefs.” Of course, that wording was chosen to: 1) make people think that not liking the federal “government” means that you must be a racist and a bigot, and; 2) make people think that it’s “despicable” to not want to be ruled by a bunch of power-happy parasites.

The only specific example given of this supposed “anti-government” violence was the shooting of two cops in Las Vegas by Jerad and Amanda Miller back in mid 2014. Curiously, just after that happened, when I tried to find out more about those supposed “anti-government extremists,” I couldn’t find anyone who knew them. In fact, despite having about 4,000 Facebook “friends” at the time—most of them anarchists—I had no shared “friends” with the two. Gee, what are the odds?

But then comes the most amazing part of the article. The feds already declare certain groups (like ISIS and al Qaeda) to be “terror organizations,” and prosecute people for supporting such groups. But there is no equivalent law allowing the feds to prosecute “white supremacists,” the KKK, or “anti-government extremists.” So, according to the CNN article, those poor federal control freaks are forced to “find more concrete charges to lock them up.” Since “domestic terrorism” is not an actual crime, in and of itself, “domestic terror groups or actors must be prosecuted with firearms or explosives offenses, hate crimes or murder.”

Wow. Those poor federal persecutors, complaining about not being able to cage people for thinking things or associating with certain groups or ideas. What is the world coming to when you can’t lock someone up until they’ve actually threatened or tried to hurt someone? Apparently we need a Federal Department of Thought Police to protect us. Of course, given their twisted Orwellian terminology, I would absolutely count as an “anti-government extremist,” which means I’m one of those people (as are many readers of The Free Thought Project, no doubt) whom the DOJ really wishes they could lock up just for thinking things and saying things. I am openly and proudly anti-“government,” precisely because “government” is always pro-aggression, anti-freedom and anti-justice. I guess that makes me an “enemy of the people” who must be destroyed by any means necessary.

It is quite clear from Carlin’s comments that the fascists at the DOJ are not content to only go after people who actually harm (or try to harm) others. No, if you don’t like being ruled, if you think violent aggression is bad even when it’s “legal,” if you think all human interaction should be peaceful and voluntary, then you are despicable and dangerous, and the DOJ will be looking for new excuses to lock you up. Good to know

read more:

MI5 Agent Annie Machon knows that Israeli Mossad was behind 9-11

February 23, 2014 by  
Filed under Video

6-29-10 Gulf Oil Rig Explosion- Incompetence, Terrorism, Israel, Unidentified Submarine, A Question
http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list…

Unidentified Sub in the Gulf – Was it Israel and Rogue US Zionist Government again?

Israel is behind all the World’s Terrorism

http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTI…

JFK vs Israel and Dimona – The Stand, Murder, and Takeover (John F. Kennedy)

Gilad Atzmon on Terrorist Israel, Zionism, Jews, Judaism, Gaza Massacres, Old Testament
http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list…

Ex AIPAC Richard Forer Exposes Israel and Zionist 6-21-10

Zionist History (TFC-TIU Radio 6-20-10)
http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list…

War Criminal Meeting Tony Blair Praises Benjamin Netanyahu on Gaza Blockade

Israels Fake Videos of the Freedom Flotilla EXPOSED

GORDON DUFF: “DANCING ISRAELI” FILM STUDIOS PRESENT: FAKED ATTACK VIDEOS
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/06/…

US Citizen 19yr old Shot 4x in Head on Gaza Flotilla via IDF

US Student Loses her Eye Shot in Face while Protesting via IDF

USS Liberty Survivor Edward Peck, Injured During the Israeli Flotilla Terrorism

6-9-10 Alan Sabrosky on Israels Gaza Flotilla Attack
http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list…

USS LIBERTY – ISRAEL AMBUSHED ON JUNE 8, 1967 – HONOR HER CREW

USS Liberty : This month in history

6-3-10 “Lost Nukes” Israel is using to blackmail the US Jeff Gates, Gordon Duff, Phil Tourney
PLAYLIST LINK
http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list…

Making Treason Transparent Jeff Gates

AIPAC Brilliantly Broke Down by Anthony Lawson

6-1-10 Paul C Roberts USA Traitors AIPAC, Zionist Jews,Zionist Chrisian Loyal to ISRAEL – USA Hijacked

6-2-10 Cynthia Mckinney Israel owns the US Government

5-31-10 Gaza Flotilla Massacre – Cynthia McKinney TIU Radio
PLAYLIST LINK
http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list…

6-2-10 US Military – Phil Tourney USS Liberty Survivor Speaks Out to You

Dr Alan Sabrosky Former Director of US Military War College – The Military KNOWS Israeli Mossad and Rogue Zionist US Government did 911 Full Playlist
http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list…

BBC Alan Hart – Israel Mossad did 911 and Iran does not want Nukes

Israel did 9/11, ALL THE PROOF IN THE WORLD!!-
http://theinfounderground.com/forum/v…

DHS Labels Liberty-Lovers as Potential Terrorists

November 25, 2012 by  
Filed under General News

source:newamerican

by

By the Department of Homeland Security’s standards, anyone who just celebrated the Fourth of July can be capable of terrorism. A new study by the DHS states that “those who are reverent of individual liberty” may promote terrorism.

WND.com reports:

The study and related data were recently produced by the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism, or START, at the University of Maryland. START was launched with a $12 million grant from DHS and is recognized by the organization as one of its “Centers for Excellence.” In December, DHS announced it was renewing START’s funding with another $3.6 million.

The study, entitled “Hot Spots of Terrorism and Other Crimes in the United States, 1970-2008,” makes a number of observations, including that one third of all terrorist attacks between 1970 and 2008 took place in five metropolitan counties run by Democrats. The report breaks down the terrorist attacks between the counties, and separates them according to lists based on ideologies, ranging from right-wing and left-wing to religious and single issue.

START defines “left-wing” as anyone who wants “to bring about change through violent revolution rather than through established political process. This category also includes secular left-wing groups that rely heavily on terrorism to overthrow the capitalist system and either establish ‘a dictatorship of the proletariat’ (Maxist-Leninists) or, much more rarely, a decentralized, non-hierarchical political system (anarchists).”

It defines “right-wing” as one who “believes that one’s personal and/or national ‘way of life’ is under attack and is either already lost or that the threat is imminent.” It states that right-wing terrorists include those who revere liberty and are suspicious of a centralized government.

It also defines potential terrorists as those interested in forcing religion into the political sphere and and those opposed to abortion. WND notes, “This is not the first time a government report has listed conservative groups such as evangelical Christians and tea-party members as potential terrorists.”

A 2009 DHS security report issued harsh warnings against unnamed right-wing terrorists, which the DHS defined as those who were opposed to abortion, and were concerned about illegal immigration, an increase in federal power, firearms restrictions, and a loss of American sovereignty.

The report, titled “Right-wing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment,” dated April 7, states that “threats from white supremacist and violent anti-government groups during 2009 have been largely rhetorical and have not indicated plans to carry out violent acts.”

The report from the DHS’s Office of Intelligence and Analysis defines right-wing extremism in the United States as “divided into those groups, movements and adherents that are primarily hate-oriented (based on hatred of particular religious, racial or ethnic groups) and those that are mainly anti-government, rejecting federal authority in favor of state or local authority, or rejecting government authority entirely. It may include groups and individuals that are dedicated to a single issue, such as opposition to abortion or immigration.”

“The consequences of a prolonged economic downturn — including real estate foreclosures, unemployment and an inability to obtain credit — could create a fertile recruiting environment for right-wing extremists and even result in confrontations between such groups and government authorities similar to those in the past,” the 2009 report noted.

It added that “growth in these groups subsided in reaction to increased government scrutiny as a result of the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing and disrupted plots, improvements in the economy and the continued U.S. standing as the pre-eminent world power.”

Similarly, a 2009 report by the Missouri Information Analysis Center labeled those who have bumper stickers for third-party political candidates such as Ron Paul, Bob Barr, and Chuck Baldwin as suspicious individuals. It further warned law enforcement to watch out for individuals with “radical” ideologies based on Christian views, such as opposing illegal immigration, abortion, and federal taxes.

Americans for Legal Immigration stated, “Police were instructed to look for Americans who were concerned about unemployment, taxes, illegal immigration, gangs, border security, abortion, high costs of living, gun restrictions, FEMA, the IRS, The Federal Reserve, and the North American Union/SPP/North American Community. The ‘Missouri Documents’ also said potential domestic terrorists might like gun shows, short wave radios, combat movies, movies with white male heroes, Tom Clancy novels, and Presidential Candidates Ron Paul, Bob Barr, and Chuck Baldwin!”

The FBI’s Communities Against Terrorism program labels those who purchase food in bulk as possible terrorists, as well as those who use cash to purchase items and show interest in using the Internet in public places.

The federal government has been wide-ranging in its use of the “terrorist” label. But START has defended its 2012 report by asserting that unlike previous reports that have labeled members of groups such as the Tea Party as terrorists, its study refers only to those who have actually committed terrorist acts.

But while the report identifies seemingly average Americans as potential terrorists, it completely ignores any references to Islamic terrorism. In fact, its table displaying the “hot spots” for religious terrorism indicates that there was no such terrorism in New York City in the 1990s — totally disregarding the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center in that city.

PJ Media also observes that the report conveniently leaves out the 1994 shooting by admitted anti-Semite Rashid Baz that resulted in the death of 16-year-old Jewish student Ari Halberstam and the attempted murder of dozens more on the Brooklyn Bridge. Baz admitted he shot Halberstam because he was Jewish.

It also ignores the 2002 shooting at the El Al (Israel’s national airline) ticket counter at Los Angeles International Airport by Hesham Mohamed Hadayet, who murdered two and wounded four others. Hadayet was later confirmed by the FBI and DOJ to be an Egyptian terrorist who wanted to be a Muslim martyr.

WND also notes, “By cutting the report off at 2007, it was able to omit events such as the Fort Hood massacre by Maj. Nidal Hasan, who killed 13 people and wounded 29 others, and the Little Rock Army recruiting center, where a Muslim convert shot soldiers in front of a recruiting office.”

Critics note that this new DHS study is yet another example of political correctness run amok, as patriotic Americans are unfairly labeled as terrorist threats even as legitimate threats go unmentioned.

source:http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/constitution/item/11973-dhs-labels-liberty-lovers-as-potential-terrorists

Feds label liberty lovers ‘terrorists’ … again

November 25, 2012 by  
Filed under General News

source :wnd.com

The government is once again promoting the idea of “those who are reverent of individual liberty” being terrorists with a new study funded by the Department of Homeland Security.

The study and related data were recently produced by the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism, or START, at the University of Maryland. START was launched with a $12 million grant from DHS and is recognized by the organization as one of its “Centers for Excellence.” In December, DHS announced it was renewing START’s funding with another $3.6 million.

read more:http://www.wnd.com/2012/07/feds-label-liberty-lovers-terrorists-again/

In constitutional republics, presidents don’t have ‘kill lists’

June 7, 2012 by  
Filed under General News

dailey caller:

Washington routinely criticizes despotic regimes where officials exercise the  power of life and death without restraint. President Barack Obama is such an  official.

The U.S. has been fighting the “war on terrorism” for more than a decade.  Washington has turned targeted killing — or assassination — into routine  practice. The military deploys SEALs when the job needs to be close and  personal, like killing Osama bin Laden. But drones are the preferred tool of  choice. The administration claims to have recently used one to kill al-Qaida’s  number two man, Abu Yahya al-Libi, in Pakistan.

This new form of warfare raises fundamental questions for a constitutional  republic. International law bars arbitrary killing. Domestic law further  restricts the execution of U.S. citizens. Moreover, promiscuous assassinations  move foreign policy into the shadows, reducing public debate over basic issues  of war and peace.

The issue ended up in federal court in August 2010 when Nasser al-Awlaki filed suit seeking a preliminary injunction to prevent the Obama administration from executing his son, Anwar al-Awlaki. The latter had been added to the federal “kill list” for his activities in Yemen with al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP). The judge dismissed the lawsuit on procedural grounds and Anwar was later killed by a Predator drone.

Limits on government are necessary to preserve a liberal democratic order and  protect individual liberty. The potential for abuse is greatest where state  power is most extreme. There is no more extreme power than the power to  kill.

After 9/11, one could view terrorism as a form of war, but the authorization  of force passed in response more than a decade ago targeted people who since  have been mostly killed or captured — those who “planned, authorized, committed,  or aided” the 9/11 attacks. To legitimize presidential action today, Congress  should vote for a declaration of war directed against present threats to  America.

Read more:  http://dailycaller.com/2012/06/07/in-constitutional-republics-presidents-dont-have-kill-lists/#ixzz1x8eBOkGr